triloha.blogg.se - Virtualmachine for linux

Virtualmachine for linux install#
Virtualmachine for linux download#
Virtualmachine for linux free#
Virtualmachine for linux windows#

This will automatically run the image inside the VM.

Well done! Now you only need to find mint-hadoop.ova you previusly downloaded and double left clik on it.

Virtualmachine for linux install#

Note that you may be prompted during installation to provide permissions to install the VirtualBox package.

Next, install the VM from the package you downloaded.

Virtualmachine for linux download#

Now select the platform you are running your system on and then download the VM. The easiest way to do it is just to click on the provided link.

Now it is time to first download the appropriate file Oracle VM VirtualBox packages and then install them.

So our next step now is to install this program (we are assuming you don’t have it installed yet, but in case you do you can skip all the way down to the last two steps). ova extention stands for “Open Virtual Appliance” and is basically the already prepared virtual machine image, which now just needs to be loaded into the VM VirtualBox. The screenshot of the pop up window and the site is presented on the picture bellow. Save it to your hard drive, by making sure the option “Save File” is selected and than pressing “Ok”.

Once you have clicked on the link, left-click on the file named mint-hadoop.ova.

In case of problems with large file download, please use 7-Zip-splitted files in a subdirectory there.

The first thing you need to do is download the provided Linux Mint with the Hadoop.

There might be a performance difference between VMware server 2 and Virtualbox, but options for settings are pretty low for me, and when choosing between Virtualbox or VMware player, I would take Virtualbox. I never tested VMware player, it is too low-end for me. VMware server 2 knows it only experimentally you need to set it up through a command, and VMware server 1 is slower. Virtualbox can use VT-X or AMD-V and it is really user friendly. KVM can run in a different mode without these instructions. The problem is that if you want to use KVM with its performance, you need to have CPU with Intel VT-X or AMD-V instructions.

Virtualmachine for linux windows#

If you want to use Windows VMs and Linux VMs and you care about performance, use ESXi. But, if you want to use a bare metal hypervisor, the fastest will be Xenserver when using Linux-only VMs. I didn't try to test VMware ESXi and Citrix Xenserver application performance. So if you want to virtualize with bigger power and small performance degradation, use KVM. The others are just applications running on OS layer. It takes less % of cpu to virtualize power for VM then others, because KVM is a module inside the Linux kernel. The fastest is KVM, then Virtualbox, VMware server 2, VMware server 1, and finally QEMU. I ran a few tests to check CPU power under Virtualbox, KVM, VMware server 1 and VMware server 2. I can tell you - this is most stable, it is not newest, but for server - greatest option for me. Only 256 MB RAM, x32 Debian and a 2GB partition - enough, that's all. We have one small VM for teamspeak, Ventrillo and so on. For debian there is 2GB partition enough. Before Lubuntu I used Xubuntu, because it was faster than Ubuntu as well.Īlso, Ubuntu needs about 4.5GB of space. I think (but I'm not sure) that Lubuntu uses the same packages as Ubuntu. It means "Low Ubuntu" and is meant for slow PCs, so it' sfaster than ordinary Ubuntu. If you hate the slow speed of Ubuntu but don't want to use Debian, use Lubuntu. Nowadays I use Lubuntu desktop in Virtualbox. On the other hand, when I tried to autoremove some libraries on Ubuntu it installed absolutely everything. Ubuntu also has more packages and newer packages.

On desktops I had problems with Debian, while APT installations from the web were working without a problem on Ubuntu. I'm not saying not to use Ubuntu at all, but for servers I'd favor Debian even if you're new.

Virtualmachine for linux free#

If you want a stable server and want to maximize free RAM, choose Debian instead.

Ubuntu Server uses newer versions of packages, but it also complicates installations and compilation of some stable apps.

Ordinary Ubuntu installs about 1300 packages, and ordinary desktop Debian installs 900 to 1100 packages. Also, if you do a clean install of Ubuntu Server, it will install two to three hundred packages, while Debian only installs 50 to 90. Consumption of RAM was much bigger on Ubuntu Server when comparing it to Debian. When comparing Debian and Ubuntu Server: Ubuntu Server boots slower/later. So if your Debian has any problems, you can solve them on the Ubuntu forums, which is a big advantage. Whatever you need, you can just install it later and it is still very quick, and it takes almost no memory. (x32 was taking only 16-32Mb of RAM and 圆4 was taking about 48-80Mb when it boots up).

It boots very quickly and consumes just a few MB of RAM. If you install Debian, install just clean Debian -> CLI and nothing else. I used both of them, so don't judge me please. For a server, forget Ubuntu Server and use Debian instead. For starting with Linux in a VM, I recommend Ubuntu.